University VSTEP Info Page
The design effectively uses clear typography and ample white space to highlight the main information about the VSTEP certification. However, the interface could improve by organizing content more visually with interactive elements and enhancing navigational cues for better user engagement.
Public

Design Score
Polish Opportunities
Design Perspectives
0To Review
Recommended Fixes by Impact
0Total
Fixes by Category
1
Color & Contrast2
Content Readability & Clarity3
Visual Consistency, Imagery & Media2
Navigation & Structure1
Conversion & Actions0
Tone, Friendliness & Delight2
Accessibility & Input Ergonomics2
Efficiency & Cognitive Load1
Flow & States Completeness1
Strategic DesignRecommended Fixes by Impact
0Critical
3Major
12Moderate
1Minor
Primary navigation is hidden behind a hamburger menu
Major
Navigation & Structure
The Problem
The main navigation menu is accessible only via a hamburger icon on the top right, with no visible links or labels in the header area.
Why it Matters
Users may not immediately find or access the primary navigation, leading to confusion and difficulty in exploring the site.
How to Fix
Display key navigation links directly in the header or provide visible navigation labels alongside the hamburger icon to improve discoverability.
Issue Highlights
No visible current page or section indicator
Major
Orientation Missing (Environment/Role/Location)
The Problem
There is no breadcrumb, highlighted menu item, or title bar clearly indicating the user's current location within the site navigation.
Why it Matters
Users may feel lost or uncertain about where they are on the site, reducing their confidence and ease of navigation.
How to Fix
Add visible indicators such as breadcrumbs, page titles, or highlighted navigation items to clarify the current location.
Issue Highlights
Small clickable hamburger menu icon
Major
Accessibility & Input Ergonomics
The Problem
The hamburger menu icon in the top right corner appears to be smaller than the recommended minimum target size for touch, roughly around 24x24 pixels, which is smaller than the recommended 44x44 pixels.
Why it Matters
Small touch targets make it difficult for users, especially those with limited dexterity, to reliably activate interactive elements, leading to user frustration and repeated attempts.
How to Fix
Increase the size of the hamburger menu target area to at least 44x44 pixels, with adequate padding around the icon to make it easier to tap.
Issue Highlights
Body text contrast is too low
Moderate
Color & Contrast
The Problem
The body text below the heading uses a gray color on a very light cream background, resulting in low contrast likely below WCAG AA standards for normal text.
Why it Matters
Low contrast makes the text hard to read, especially for users with visual impairments or in bright environments.
How to Fix
Use a darker text color or a lighter background to improve contrast to meet at least WCAG AA contrast ratio of 4.5:1 for normal text.
Issue Highlights
Body text size may be too small for comfortable reading
Moderate
Content Readability & Clarity
The Problem
The body text under the heading appears small, likely below 14px, which can reduce readability especially for longer passages.
Why it Matters
Small body text can cause strain and reduce comprehension, especially for users with visual impairments or on smaller screens.
How to Fix
Increase the font size of the main body text to at least 16px and consider improving line height and spacing for better readability.
Issue Highlights
Inconsistent spacing around images around center text
Moderate
Visual Consistency, Imagery & Media
The Problem
The four images surrounding the center text block are unevenly spaced and not aligned symmetrically, with the top-left image closer to the text compared to the top-right image.
Why it Matters
Uneven alignment distracts users and reduces the perceived professionalism and balance of the layout.
How to Fix
Adjust the spacing and alignment of the four images so that they are symmetrically placed equidistant around the center text block.
Issue Highlights
Primary CTA 'Xem thêm' label is vague
Moderate
Conversion & Actions
The Problem
'Xem thêm' translates to 'See more' or 'Read more', which is a generic CTA label that does not specify what the user will get after clicking. The button is visually distinct but the label lacks clarity on the action's outcome.
Why it Matters
A vague CTA can reduce user motivation to click as they may not understand the value or the next step, potentially lowering engagement and conversion.
How to Fix
Use a more specific and action-oriented label that clearly describes what users can expect, like 'Learn about VSTEP levels' or 'Discover VSTEP details'.
Issue Highlights
Excessive decorative images distract from main content
Moderate
Efficiency & Cognitive Load
The Problem
There are four tilted images around the main text that do not serve any clear interaction or informational purpose, adding visual clutter around the central message.
Why it Matters
Users may find it harder to focus on the main explanation and call to action because the decorative images compete for their attention.
How to Fix
Reduce the number of decorative images or simplify the layout to keep the user's focus on the key content and the 'Xem thêm' button.
Issue Highlights
Unclear destination for 'Xem thêm' button
Moderate
Flow & States Completeness
The Problem
The button labeled 'Xem thêm' (See more) is visible but it is unclear what action or destination this button leads to from the content shown on the screen.
Why it Matters
Users may be uncertain about what will happen if they click the button, potentially causing hesitation or abandonment.
How to Fix
Clearly communicate the next step or action associated with this button, such as by adding an icon, tooltip, or descriptive label. Ensure content beyond this screen matches the user's expectations for 'See more'.
Issue Highlights
Lack of Visual Hierarchy and Memorable Brand Focus
Moderate
Strategic Design
The Problem
The screen shows a central text explanation about 'Chứng chỉ VSTEP' surrounded by four small card images placed at corners with no strong focal visual emphasis. The layout lacks a clear visual hierarchy and memorable design element that quickly draws users' eyes to the most important information or brand value proposition.
Why it Matters
Without a clear, memorable focal area or differentiated design feature, users may find the page bland and be less likely to engage or remember key messages, reducing overall user satisfaction.
How to Fix
Enhance visual hierarchy by increasing size and prominence of the main message or adding a compelling hero image or graphic. Reduce peripheral clutter and increase focus on the key information or call to action.
Issue Highlights
Body text lacks clear visual hierarchy
Moderate
Content Readability & Clarity
The Problem
The body text uses mostly similar font weight and size for multiple lines, causing a flat visual hierarchy that makes it harder to scan or prioritize information.
Why it Matters
Weak hierarchy makes it difficult for users to differentiate key points and scan the content efficiently, which can reduce comprehension and engagement.
How to Fix
Use consistent but varied font weights and sizes to emphasize important terms and separate different content sections more clearly.
Issue Highlights
Different rounding and shadows on image cards
Moderate
Visual Consistency, Imagery & Media
The Problem
The four images have inconsistent corner rounding and subtle shadow effects, making them look visually mismatched.
Why it Matters
Inconsistent image styling breaks visual harmony and can confuse users about grouping or hierarchy.
How to Fix
Apply a consistent border radius and shadow style across all image cards to unify their appearance.
Issue Highlights
Multiple visual cards around main content create click confusion
Moderate
Navigation & Structure
The Problem
Four visually similar image cards placed near the main text section may compete as click targets without clear indication of their unique purpose.
Why it Matters
Users may be distracted or unsure which card to select, reducing navigation efficiency and causing potential frustration.
How to Fix
Provide clearer labeling and spacing for image cards or reduce the number of simultaneous click targets near main content.
Issue Highlights
Hamburger menu and Đăng ký button too close
Moderate
Accessibility & Input Ergonomics
The Problem
The clickable hamburger menu icon and the ‘Đăng ký’ button near the top right corner are placed near each other with little spacing between their touch targets, possibly less than 8 pixels gap.
Why it Matters
When touch targets are too close, users may accidentally tap the wrong control, increasing error rates and causing frustration.
How to Fix
Add more spacing or padding between the hamburger menu and the register button to separate their touch target zones.
Issue Highlights
Multiple visual elements create competing focus points
Moderate
Efficiency & Cognitive Load
The Problem
The top right 'Đăng ký' button and the scattered VSTEP images provide multiple visual elements competing for attention alongside the main text and call to action button.
Why it Matters
Users might be unsure what to focus on first, which can delay or discourage interaction.
How to Fix
Prioritize the most important action visually, such as by de-emphasizing less critical elements or grouping actions more clearly.
Issue Highlights
Hamburger menu icon unlabeled
Minor
Visual Consistency, Imagery & Media
The Problem
The hamburger icon at top right is presented without a label or tooltip, which may confuse some users unfamiliar with this icon.
Why it Matters
Lack of label for navigation icons can increase cognitive load or make navigation unclear to less tech-savvy users.
How to Fix
Add a tooltip or aria-label to the hamburger menu icon to clarify its function.
Issue Highlights