Workflow Execution Debugger
The design effectively uses a clear two-pane layout that separates filters and search controls from the detailed results, aiding user focus and task flow. However, the interface could improve by enhancing visual hierarchy in the results section and providing clearer affordances for interaction, especially on filtering options and result item details.
Public

Design Score
Polish Opportunities
Design Perspectives
0To Review
Recommended Fixes by Impact
0Total
Fixes by Category
2
Color & Contrast0
Content Readability & Clarity2
Visual Consistency, Imagery & Media1
Navigation & Structure1
Conversion & Actions0
Tone, Friendliness & Delight2
Accessibility & Input Ergonomics3
Efficiency & Cognitive Load3
Flow & States Completeness1
Strategic DesignRecommended Fixes by Impact
0Critical
3Major
13Moderate
1Minor
No action or link to interact with each execution result
Major
Flow & States Completeness
The Problem
Each workflow execution result shown is static text only, with no buttons or links to drill down into the details or perform further operations.
Why it Matters
Users cannot continue their workflow or get detailed insights, making the results panel a dead-end and potentially reducing the tool's usefulness.
How to Fix
Add interactive elements like clickable cards, detail view buttons, or action menus for each execution entry.
Issue Highlights
Missing clear page or section title for orientation
Major
Orientation Missing (Environment/Role/Location)
The Problem
The interface only shows a small 'Debug' label and a 'Debug source' dropdown without a distinct, prominent title or breadcrumb indicating the exact environment, role, or current page context to the user. The user may not easily identify what area or function they are working within from the visible UI.
Why it Matters
Users may become confused about where they are in the system, reducing confidence and potentially causing navigation errors or disengagement.
How to Fix
Add a distinct, prominent section or page title and breadcrumb navigation that explicitly states the current environment and context of the data view.
Issue Highlights
Missing guidance for empty results when no executions are found
Major
Flow & States Completeness
The Problem
If the fetch returns no workflow execution results, there is no visible message or guidance to inform the user that no data was found or what to do next.
Why it Matters
Users could be confused about whether the system is malfunctioning or if no data exists, leading to frustration or unnecessary repeated queries.
How to Fix
Implement an empty state message that confirms no results were found and suggest next steps, such as changing filters or trying a different query.
Issue Highlights
Low contrast for label texts in left panel
Moderate
Color & Contrast
The Problem
Label texts such as 'Status', 'Search by', and 'Limit' appear to be in a shade of gray on a white background with insufficient contrast for comfortable reading (likely below 4.5:1 ratio).
Why it Matters
Users with low vision or color deficiencies may have difficulty reading these labels, reducing overall usability of the form controls.
How to Fix
Increase the contrast of these labels by using a darker color or stronger font weight to achieve at least WCAG AA 4.5:1 contrast ratio against the background.
Issue Highlights
Date/time fields missing timezone indication
Moderate
Ambiguous Date/Time/Timezone
The Problem
The 'Created at' timestamps such as '17/04/2026, 11:04:53' do not specify any timezone, which can confuse users about the exact time reference.
Why it Matters
Users may misunderstand the timing of workflow executions if they assume a different timezone, leading to confusion or errors in coordinating events.
How to Fix
Add a clear timezone indicator to all date/time fields or specify the timezone context in the UI.
Issue Highlights
Result blocks left edges misaligned with side panel inputs
Moderate
Visual Consistency, Imagery & Media
The Problem
The left edges of the result blocks in the pane on the right do not align vertically with the input fields and dropdowns in the left debug source panel. This creates a visual imbalance.
Why it Matters
Misalignment increases cognitive load and reduces perceived professionalism, making it harder for users to visually scan and associate components.
How to Fix
Align the left edges of the result container with the left edges of the form inputs in the debug source panel.
Issue Highlights
Unclear purpose of 'Fetch' button inside filter form
Moderate
Conversion & Actions
The Problem
The 'Fetch' button label is vague and does not communicate what data or results will be retrieved upon clicking, reducing clarity for users.
Why it Matters
Users may hesitate or be confused about what action the button performs, which can lead to slower interactions or errors in using the form.
How to Fix
Change the button label to something more descriptive such as 'Fetch Workflow Executions' or 'Retrieve Data' to clearly indicate the action.
Issue Highlights
Small clickable chevron controls for dropdown and date selection
Moderate
Accessibility & Input Ergonomics
The Problem
The dropdown arrow for the 'Status' select control and the clear button (X) in the date selector appear to be visually small tap targets, likely below recommended minimum touch target size (around 44x44 pixels).
Why it Matters
Small tap targets increase the difficulty of accurate selection on touch devices, causing user frustration and potential input errors.
How to Fix
Increase the size of the clickable areas for these interactive elements to meet minimum touch target guidelines, such as making the chevron and clear icon at least 44x44 pixels in size with sufficient padding.
Issue Highlights
Verbose result entries overwhelm the scanability of results
Moderate
Efficiency & Cognitive Load
The Problem
Each result block displays multiple lines of IDs and timestamps with the same label format, causing visual repetition and clutter in the results pane.
Why it Matters
Users need to scan for key information quickly but may struggle as all details look similar and take up excessive space.
How to Fix
Simplify result entries by highlighting critical fields only and using concise layouts or expandable detail views.
Issue Highlights
Unclear next action after fetching results
Moderate
Flow & States Completeness
The Problem
After pressing the 'Fetch' button, the results load but there is no obvious way to proceed further, such as viewing detailed information or taking action on the returned workflow executions.
Why it Matters
Users may be confused about what to do next after seeing the results, potentially causing frustration or abandonment of the task.
How to Fix
Provide clear next step actions like buttons or links to view details, retry, export, or perform other relevant actions on the fetched results.
Issue Highlights
Low contrast for placeholder input text
Moderate
Color & Contrast
The Problem
The placeholder text in the input field, such as 'Workflow id...' and 'Select dates', appears to have low contrast against the white background, likely making it difficult to read for some users and possibly below WCAG AA standards.
Why it Matters
Low contrast placeholder text can make it hard for users with visual impairments or in bright environments to identify the input fields and understand their purpose.
How to Fix
Increase the contrast of the placeholder text by making it darker or by changing its color to meet at least WCAG AA 4.5:1 contrast ratio against the white background.
Issue Highlights
Dense layout of multiple execution results with limited visual separation
Moderate
Navigation & Structure
The Problem
The results list on the right side shows multiple blocks of execution summaries stacked vertically with minimal spacing, making it difficult to visually parse and differentiate between individual items quickly.
Why it Matters
Users may find it hard to quickly scan, select, or compare multiple entries, leading to slower task completion or errors.
How to Fix
Increase vertical spacing between individual result cards, or add stronger visual dividers to help users distinguish entries more easily.
Issue Highlights
Dropdown and text input fields with closely spaced controls
Moderate
Accessibility & Input Ergonomics
The Problem
The dropdown for 'Status' and the adjacent text input for 'Limit' with their associated controls have minimal horizontal spacing, especially between clickable areas like the dropdown arrow and input field edges.
Why it Matters
Close proximity can cause accidental taps on adjacent controls, leading to input errors.
How to Fix
Add more horizontal spacing or padding between these controls to ensure distinct touch zones that do not overlap or crowd each other.
Issue Highlights
Separate 'Search by' radio buttons cause extra decision steps
Moderate
Efficiency & Cognitive Load
The Problem
Users must explicitly choose from three 'Search by' options before entering data, which adds an unnecessary gating step to the search process.
Why it Matters
Additional choices before query input increase decision friction and can slow the user down.
How to Fix
Use dynamic input fields or contextual hints that adapt automatically based on user input rather than requiring preselection.
Issue Highlights
Multiple overlapping filters create complex query setup
Moderate
Efficiency & Cognitive Load
The Problem
The interface requires setting multiple filters (View dropdown, Search by radio, workflow_id input, Status dropdown, Created at date input, Limit input) plus a separate Fetch button to see results. This requires multiple small steps and interactions before results are loaded.
Why it Matters
Users must manage many small input elements and decisions before any data fetch can happen, increasing task completion time and cognitive load.
How to Fix
Combine related filters where possible, use auto-fetch or incremental filtering to reduce explicit fetch clicks, and simplify the number of filters shown initially.
Issue Highlights
Visual hierarchy lacks clear focus between search inputs and results
Moderate
Strategic Design
The Problem
The search input controls on the left and the results on the right share a similar muted style and text formatting, making it difficult to immediately discern the primary action area or successful result highlights.
Why it Matters
Users may struggle to focus their attention on the most important interaction areas or understand the success state at a glance, slowing decision-making and increasing cognitive load.
How to Fix
Enhance visual differentiation by increasing contrast and boldness in key areas such as the selected filters and result status labels. Introduce more distinct colors or typography scales to separate the query form from results.
Issue Highlights
Status badges inconsistent contrast and padding
Minor
Visual Consistency, Imagery & Media
The Problem
The 'EXECUTION_SUCCEEDED' status badges use a bold blue text style on a very lightly shaded background that differs slightly from other badge styles in the UI, including varying padding around text.
Why it Matters
Inconsistent badge styles can confuse users about the meaning or importance of statuses and reduce the polished look of the interface.
How to Fix
Standardize badge styles including text weight, background shading, and padding based on a shared component design.
Issue Highlights